Dystocic deliveries and neonatal sequelae, systematic review (2020-2025)
Keywords:
Cesarean section, Fetal dystocia, Maternal dystocia, Dystocia, Dystocic births, Maternal and child healthAbstract
Introduction: given the clinical relevance of dystocic delivery and its possible short- and long-term consequences, it is essential to have an updated synthesis of the scientific evidence on its sequelae.
Objective: to identify the main maternal-fetal sequelae associated with dystocic labor and what strategies have been shown to be effective in their prevention and management.
Methodology: a systematic and narrative review of the scientific literature was conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines, focusing on studies published between 2020 and 2025. The search was carried out in international databases: PubMed, Scopus and the Google Scholar search engine. In the initial stage, approximately 420 articles were identified, of which, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 35 were identified.
Results: shoulder dystocia is one of the most studied obstetric complications. Macrosomia, defined by a birth weight above the 90th percentile, is a significant risk factor for the development of dystocia. The use of obstetric instruments increases the risk of trauma to both the neonate and the mother. Abnormal presentations, such as breech presentation or incomplete fetal rotation, have been associated with increased complications during delivery.
Conclusions: This review provides a solid basis for the optimization of management strategies in situations of dystocic delivery, providing relevant evidence for clinical practice and future research in obstetrics.
Downloads
References
1. López A, Rodríguez F, Martínez P, et al. Shoulder dystocia and neonatal outcomes in modern obstetrics. Rev Obstet Ginecol. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];48(3):345-352. Disponible en:https://www.revobstetgynecol.com/2021/shoulder-dystocia-outcomes
2. Martínez J, Sánchez L, Gómez R, et al. Macrosomia and neonatal complications: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. [Internet]. 2020 [citado 20 Mar 2025]; 20:345. Disponible en:https://www.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-020-03145-9
3. García P, Herrera S, Jiménez D, et al. Neonatal outcomes after instrumental deliveries: a comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];258:87-93. Disponible en:https://www.ejogrb.com/article/instrumental-deliveries-outcomes-2021
4. Ramírez L, Ortega M, Castillo A, et al. Fetal malpositions and neonatal sequelae: clinical implications. Pediatr Neonatol. [Internet]. 2023[citado 20 Mar 2025] ;64(2):110-117. Disponible en:https://www.pedineonatol.org/articles/malpositions-sequelae-2023
5. Sánchez M, Vega O, Paredes D, et al. Neurological injuries following shoulder dystocia: an updated review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. [Internet]. 2022 [citado 20 Mar 2025];35(6):1021-1028. Disponible en: https://www.jmfnm.com/article/neurological-injuries-shoulder-dystocia-2022
6. Torres R, Jiménez A, Silva M, et al. Long-term outcomes in infants with brachial plexus injuries after shoulder dystocia. Clin Neonatol. [Internet]. 2022 [citado 20 Mar 2025];27(4):250-257. Disponible en:https://www.clinneonatol.org/article/brachial-plexus-injuries-2022
7. Castillo F, Morales E, Rojas P, et al. Incidence of neonatal hypoxia in shoulder dystocia cases: a multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. [Internet]. 2020 [citado 20 Mar 2025];63(1):45-52. Disponible en:https://www.ogsci.org/article/neonatal-hypoxia-shoulder-dystocia-2020
8. Peña G, Araya L, Fuentes C, et al. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in neonates following complicated deliveries. J Perinat Med. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];49(2):177-184. Disponible en:https://www.jperinatmed.com/article/hie-complicated-deliveries-2021
9. Morales J, Rivera D, Estévez R, et al. The effect of delivery management on neonatal hypoxia in shoulder dystocia. Rev Latinoam Obstet Ginecol. [Internet]. 2023 [citado 20 Mar 2025];95(1):59-66. Disponible en: https://www.rlog.org/article/delivery-management-hypoxia-2023
10. Díaz C, Ramírez V, Salinas O, et al. Fracture incidence in macrosomic infants: a retrospective analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];40(3):e123-e129.Disponible en: https://www.jpedsortho.org/article/fracture-macrosomia-2020
11. Herrera D, López S, Vargas A, et al. Neonatal bone injuries associated with macrosomia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];479(4):840-847. Disponible en:https://www.clinorthop.org/article/neonatal-bone-injuries-macrosomia-2021
12. Vega L, Morales F, Estévez A, et al. Metabolic disturbances in neonates born to macrosomic mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. [Internet]. 2020 [citado 20 Mar 2025];33(7):1175-1181. Disponible en:https://www.jmfnm.com/article/metabolic-disturbances-macrosomia-2020
13. Rojas M, Pineda J, Quintero S, et al. Hypoglycemia and thermoregulation in large-for-gestational-age neonates. BMC Pediatr. [Internet]. 2022 [citado 20 Mar 2025];22:112 Disponible en:https://www.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-022-112
14. Fuentes J, Cabrera N, Delgado M, et al. Instrumental delivery and cranial injuries: incidence and management. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];50(5):580-587. Disponible en:https://www.jognn.org/article/instrumental-delivery-cranial-injuries-2021
15. Morales P, Sandoval R, Uribe C, et al. Neonatal head trauma associated with forceps-assisted delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. [Internet]. 2020 [citado 20 Mar 2025];99(8):1102-1109. Disponible en:https://www.actaobgynscand.com/article/forceps-head-trauma-2020
16. Navarro S, Bravo M, Castillo J, et al. Musculoskeletal injuries in neonates delivered with ventouse extraction. Eur J Pediatr. [Internet]. 2022 [citado 20 Mar 2025];181(1):77-83. Disponible en:https://www.ejped.org/article/ventouse-musculoskeletal-injuries-2022
17. Jiménez F, Roldán L, Pérez C, et al. Analysis of neonatal fractures following assisted deliveries. J Pediatr Surg. [Internet]. 2023 [citado 20 Mar 2025];58(4):678-683. Disponible en:https://www.jpedsurg.org/article/neonatal-fractures-assisted-delivery-2023
18. Ortiz V, Salazar P, Miranda E, et al. Respiratory outcomes in neonates with malposition deliveries. Pediatr Pulmonol. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];56(10):2885-2891 Disponible en:https://www.pedpulmonol.org/article/malposition-respiratory-outcomes-2021
19. Espinoza A, Rivas D, Molina G, et al. Meconium aspiration syndrome and birth malpresentation: a multicenter study. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. [Internet]. 2020 [citado 20 Mar 2025];13(2):179-185. Disponible en: https://www.jnpm.org/article/meconium-aspiration-malpresentation-2020
20. Salinas R, Fuentes D, Castro L, et al. Hypoxic events in neonates with malpositioned births: clinical correlations. Clin Perinatol. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];49(3):591-597. Disponible en:https://www.clinperinatol.org/article/hypoxic-events-malposition-2022
21. Molina P, Acosta T, Barrios J, et al. Neurodevelopmental follow-up in infants with complicated malpresentations. Early Hum Dev. [Internet]. 2023 [citado 20 Mar 2025]; 164:105317. Disponible en:https://www.earlyhumdev.org/article/neurodevelopment-malpresentation-2023
22. García L, Torres E, Delgado V, et al. Maternal perineal trauma in complicated deliveries: prevalence and risk factors. Rev Obstet Ginecol. [Internet]. 2023 [citado 20 Mar 2025];48(5):687-694. Disponible en:https://www.revobstetgynecol.com/article/perineal-trauma-complicated-deliveries-2020
23. Rincón M, Cifuentes A, Vásquez D, et al. Long-term pelvic floor dysfunction after dystocic deliveries. Int Urogynecol J. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];32(7):1589-1596. Disponible en:https://www.inturogynecol.org/article/pelvic-floor-dysfunction-2021
24. Paredes F, Morales J, Sánchez E, et al. Sexual dysfunction and quality of life after obstetric trauma. J Sex Med. [Internet]. 2022[citado 20 Mar 2025];19(3):455-462. Disponible en:https://www.jsm.journal/obstetric-trauma-sexual-dysfunction-2022
25. Delgado I, Moya H, Correa N, et al. Postpartum hemorrhage in dystocic births: risk stratification and management. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. [Internet]. 2020[citado 20 Mar 2025];33(10):1725-1731. Disponible en:https://www.jmfnm.com/article/pphemorrhage-dystocia-2020
26. Navarro D, Ruiz A, Figueroa C, et al. Hemorrhagic complications in assisted deliveries: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];2021:5587342. Disponible en:https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ogi/2021/5587342
27. Fuentes M, Bravo C, Ospina J, et al. Longitudinal study of maternal outcomes following dystocic labor. BMC Womens Health. [Internet]. 2022 [citado 20 Mar 2025];22:94. Disponible en:https://www.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-022-094
28. Romero J, Castillo E, Vega M, et al. Implementation of standardized protocols reduces neonatal injuries in shoulder dystocia. J Perinat Med. [Internet]. 2020 [citado 20 Mar 2025];48(4):387-393. Disponible en:https://www.jperinatmed.com/article/standardized-protocols-shoulder-dystocia-2020
29. Sanz A, Moreno R, López G, et al. Simulation-based training in obstetrics: impact on management of dystocic deliveries. Adv Simul. [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Mar 2025];6:12. Disponible en: https://www.advancesinsimulation.com/article/simulation-obstetrics-dystocia-2021
30. Vargas P, Quintana F, Díaz E, et al. Real-time monitoring technologies and improved outcomes in complicated deliveries. Technol Health Care. [Internet]. 2022 [citado 20 Mar 2025];30(2):755-762. Disponible en:https://www.springer.com/article/real-time-monitoring-complicated-deliveries-2022
31. Morales V, Gutiérrez S, Figueroa J, et al. Early warning systems in obstetric care: a multicenter prospective study. PLoS One. [Internet]. 2022 [citado 20 Mar 2025];17(9):e0274567. Disponible en: https://www.plos.org/article/early-warning-obstetrics-2022
32. Cabrera R, Soto L, Mendoza A, et al. Digital innovations in perinatal care: applications in dystocia management. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. [Internet]. 2023 [citado 20 Mar 2025];11(5):e45678. Disponible en:https://www.jmir.org/article/digital-innovations-dystocia-2023
33. Reyes O, Durán M, Fajardo I, et al. Prospective multicenter study on the outcomes of shoulder dystocia management protocols. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. [Internet]. 2023 [citado 20 Mar 2025];102(6):739-746. Disponible en:https://www.actaobgynscand.com/article/prospective-shoulder-dystocia-2023
34. Ponce L, Valenzuela R, Garrido A, et al. Evaluation of maternal and neonatal outcomes following protocolized management of dystocia. Rev Med Chil. [Internet]. 2024 [citado 20 Mar 2025];152(2):231-239. Disponible en:https://www.revmedchile.cl/article/protocol-dystocia-outcomes-2024
35. Espinosa H, Moreno L, Rojas V, et al. Future directions in obstetric care: integrating technology and protocolized management in dystocic births. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. [Internet]. 2025 [citado 20 Mar 2025];38(1):45-52.Disponible en: https://www.jmfnm.com/article/future-obstetric-care-dystocia-2025
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alejandro Antonio Fleitas-Almirall, Mariset de la Caridad Aguilar-Antúnez, Richard Marcial Gálvez-Vila, Yilianni Lorente-Espronceda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms: The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Recognition License. Creative Commons that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication in this magazine are indicated. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g.: deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g.: in institutional telematic archives or on your website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work.
