Anticoagulation in the ICU: Balancing prophylaxis and therapy to minimize thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk

Authors

  • Richard Marcial Gálvez-Vila University of Medical Sciences of Matanzas. Colón Branch of Medical Sciences "Dr. Eusebio Hernández Pérez". Matanzas, Cuba. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0829-1357
  • Moya-Linares Moya-Linares University of Medical Sciences of Sancti Spíritus. Faculty of Medical Sciences Dr. "Faustino Pérez Hernández". Sancti Spíritus, Cuba. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7781-0675

Keywords:

ICU anticoagulation, Thrombotic-hemorrhagic risk, Viscoelastic monitoring, Personalized therapy

Abstract

Managing anticoagulation in critically ill patients requires a dynamic balance between preventing thrombotic events and minimizing bleeding risk. While low-dose heparin prophylaxis is used in general risk situations, therapeutic anticoagulation is reserved for confirmed cases of thromboembolism or those with significant hypercoagulability markers. The current approach is based on personalized and continuous assessment, using risk scores (Padua, Wells), viscoelastic tests (TEG/ROTEM), and biomarkers (D-dimer) to guide decisions. Mechanical prophylaxis is recommended in patients at high bleeding risk. The future of this clinical practice points toward the integration of personalized algorithms and dynamic monitoring, always complemented by expert clinical judgment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abdel-Qadir H, Austin PC, Pang A, Fang J, Udell JA, Geerts WH, et al. The association between anticoagulation and adverse outcomes after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test among older outpatients: A populationbased cohort study. Thromb Res. [Internet] 2022 [citado 22/10/2025]; 21(3): 114-122. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2021.12.010.

2. Wills NK, Nair N, Patel K, Sikder O, Adriaanse M, Eikelboom J, et al. Efficacy and safety of intensified versus standard prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in patients with Covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. MedRxiv. [Internet] 2022 [citado 22/10/2025]; 56(2): 234-345. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.05.22271947,2022.03.05.22271947

3. Ferrandis R, Escontrela B, Ferrando C, Hernández M, Herrera J, Hodalfo F, et al. Eficacia de la tromboprofilaxis con heparina de bajo peso molecular en pacientes críticos con COVID-19: estudio observacional, propectivo y multicéntrico. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. [Internet] 2022 [citado 22/10/2025]; 45(7):102-126. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2022.01.014.

4. Cuker A, Tseng EK, Nieuwlaat R, Angchaisuksiri P, Blair C, Dane K, et al. American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19: May 2021 update on the use of intermediate-intensity anticoagulation in critically ill patients. Blood Adv. [Internet] 2021 [citado 22/10/2025]; 13(5):39-45. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvance.2021005493.

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Gálvez-Vila RM, Moya-Linares M-L. Anticoagulation in the ICU: Balancing prophylaxis and therapy to minimize thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk. MedEst [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 1 [cited 2026 Jan. 10];6:e433. Available from: https://revmedest.sld.cu/index.php/medest/article/view/433

Issue

Section

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR